Association between Handling of Alginate Impression and Quality of Dentures

Authors

  • Bolanle Oyeyemi Akinboboye Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Lagos Author
  • Olugbenga A. Adenuga‑Taiwo Department of Restorative Dentistry, Lagos State University, Lagos Author
  • Paul I. Idon Department of Dental Surgery, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri Author
  • Linda Oge Okoye Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria Author
  • Patricia Adetokunbo Akeredolu Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60787/njgp.v18i2.48

Keywords:

removable partial dentures, quality, handling, denture quality, Alginate impression

Abstract

Objectives: Alginate impression commonly used in denture fabrication has drawbacks, which affects the quality of dentures. The objective is to determine the association between handling of alginate and denture quality.

Materials and Methods: A structured questionnaire was administered to dental personnel, managing patients that required removable prosthesis in a multicenter cross‑sectional pilot study. Information gathered were that of age, sex, number of teeth replaced, manipulation of impression material, disinfection of impression material, and quality of dentures. Likert scales were used to rate the participants’ manipulation of alginate impressions and the quality of dentures.

Statistical Analysis: Data were collated and analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20. Differences between categorical variables were tested for significance using Chi‑square tests, and Student’s t‑test was used for means. A linear relationship between variables was tested using correlation statistics, and all statistical significance was inferred at P < 0.05.

Results: Sixty‑nine participants with a mean age of 27.00 ± 6.93 (20–57 years) took part in this study. The proportion of females seen was 55.1%. The mean number of dentures fitted was 10.03 ± 5.44, and 5.14 ± 2.71 dentures were relined annually. The most common partial edentulous case was Kennedy Class III (72.5%). There was a weak but insignificant positive association (r = 0.19, P = 0.12) between the quality of denture and handling of alginate impression material. There was also no significant correlation between the years of experience of the participants and scores for quality of denture (r = 0.02, P = 0.86) nor handling of impression by the participants (r = −0.07, P = 0.57).

Conclusion: The participants’ handling of alginate impression did not influence the quality of partial dentures made from them. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dosumu OO, Dosumu EB, Arowojolu MO, Babalola SS. Rehabilitative management offered Nigerian localized and generalized aggressive

periodontitis patients. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:40‑52.

Bilhan H, Erdogan O, Ergin S, Celik M, Ates G, Geckili O. Complication rates and patient satisfaction with removable dentures. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:109‑15.

Garrett NR, Kapur KK, Perez P. Effects of improvements of poorly fitting dentures and new dentures on patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent

;76:403‑13.

Harper GW. Posterior base repair to maximize complete denture retention. Compendium 1993;14:454, 456, 458 passim.

Rosenoer LM, Sheiham A. Dental impacts on daily life and satisfaction with teeth in relation to dental status in adults. J Oral Rehabil

;22:469‑80.

Hummel SK, Wilson MA, Marker VA, Nunn ME. Quality of removable partial dentures worn by the adult U.S. population. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:37‑43.

Christensen GJ. Relining, rebasing partial and complete dentures. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:503‑6.

Zarb GA, Jacob R. Prolonging the useful life of complete dentures: The relining procedure. In: Zarb GA, Bolender CL, editors. Prosthodontic

Treatment for Edentulous Patients: Complete Dentures and Implant‑Supported Prostheses. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 471‑80.

Nassif J, Jumbelic R. Current concepts for relining complete dentures: A survey. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:11‑5.

Fenlon MR, Sherriff M, Walter JD. Agreement between clinical measures of quality and patients’ rating of fit of existing and new complete dentures. J Dent 2002;30:135‑9.

Soltanzadeh P, Suprono MS, Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre C, Gregorius W. An in vitro investigation of accuracy and fit of conventional and CAD/CAM removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthodont 2019;28:547‑55.

Schwindling FS, Stober T. A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:756‑63.

Fokkinga WA, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Clinical fit of partial removable dental prostheses based on alginate or polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:33‑7.

Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th Edition, Amsterdam.: Elsevier; 2012.

Muzaffar D, Choudhary S, Jameel RA, Afaq A, Tanwir F, Hashmi. A practical guide to use and methods of disinfection of alginate

impression materials. EC Dent Sci 2015;3:515‑26.

Celebić A, Knezović‑Zlatarić D, Papić M, Carek V, Baucić I, Stipetić J. Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:M948‑53.

Bharathi M, Babu KR, Reddy G, Gupta N, Misuriya A, Vinod V. Partial edentulism based on kennedy’s classification: An epidemiological study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15:229‑31.

Al‑Dwairi ZN. Partial edentulism and removable denture construction: A frequency study in Jordanians. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent

;14:13‑7.

Keyf F. Frequency of the various classes of removable partial dentures and selection of major connectors and direct/indirect retainers. Turk J Med Sci 2001;31:445‑9.

Sadig WM, Idowu AT. Removable partial denture design: A study of a selected population in Saudi Arabia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002;3:40‑53.

Nandini VV, Venkatesh KV, Nair KC. Alginate impressions: A practical perspective. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:37‑41.

Idowu A, Al‑Shamrani S. Pattern of tooth loss in a selected population at King Saud University College of Dentistry. SDJ 1995;7:135‑40.

Rubel BS. Impression materials: A comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:629‑42, vi.

Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT 2nd, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: Influence of tray

material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont 2002;11:98‑108.

Khaknegar B, Ettinger RL. Removal time: A factor in the accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4:369‑76.

Ozdal UI, Gokce S, Dalkiz M, Ozen J, Beydemir B. Effects of chemical anticeptics and disinfection methods on the dimensional stability of

irreversible hydrocolloid impression material (Alginate). Gulhane Med J 2004;46:136‑43.

Oderinu OH, Adegbulugbe IC, Shaba OP. Comparison of the dimensional stability of alginate impressions disinfected with 1% sodium hypochlorite using the spray or immersion method. Nigerian Quarterly J Hosp Med 2007;17:69‑73.

Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Dent 2004;32:603‑9.

Yu OL, Brouwers HJ. Microstructure and mechanical properties of β‑hemihydrate produced gypsum: An insight from its hydration process.

Constr Build Mater 2011;25:3149‑57.

Johnson GH, Drennon DG, Powell GL. Accuracy of elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:525‑30.

McCord JF, McNally LM, Smith PW, Grey NJ. Does the nature of the definitive impression material influence the outcome of (mandibular) complete dentures? Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:105‑8.

Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B. Complete denture education in US dental schools. J Prosthodont 2005;14:191‑7.

Lepe X, Johnson GH, Berg JC, Aw TC. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent

;79:495‑502.

Craig R. Review of dental impressions. Adv Dental Res 1988;2:51‑64.

Ashley M, McCullagh A, Sweet C. Making a good impression: A ‘how to’ paper on dental alginate. Dent Update 2005;32:169‑70, 172, 174‑5.

Hayakawa I, Watanabe I. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials. Quintessence Int 2003;34:177‑80.

Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials, Properties and Manipulation. 9th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 172‑95, 286‑309.

Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A. Evidence – Based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures:

A publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont 2011;1:1‑12.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-07

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Akinboboye BO, Adenuga‑Taiwo OA, Idon PI, Okoye LO, Akeredolu PA. Association between Handling of Alginate Impression and Quality of Dentures. NJGP [Internet]. 2020 Aug. 7 [cited 2025 Apr. 28];18(2):43-7. Available from: https://njgp.net.ng/index.php/home/article/view/48

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.